MountainViews
Welcome to MountainViews
If you want to use the website often please enrol (quick and free) at top right.

Site Feedback Site announcements, requests for features, bug reports about the software of the service.
Sort by >

More controls

<< Prev page 1 .. 19 20 21 22 23 24 .. 40 Next page >>
Post details Post   (Contract pics)
Context of comment:   (Show all posts)
Context of comment:   (Show all posts)
Context of comment:   (Show all posts)
Context of comment:   (Show all posts)
Context of comment:   (Show all posts)
Context of comment:   (Show all posts)
Context of comment:   (Show all posts)
simon3
2012-04-19 13:44:54
Re Automatic Calculation of Ascent
Context of comment:At least two people have queried the ascent / descent figures created by the track system. I have also noted a number of anomalies in results with test gps tracks from various sources including ones I made myself.
Message:Anomalies include a) usually an apparently high estimate for height gain b) a different figure for ascent and descent. Captain V's apparently lower estimate is a further exception.

The current algorithm used to determine the height gain or loss is extremely simple: it looks at the height recorded for each trackpoint (of which there can be typically between 500 and 5000 for a track). It then adds a positive increase in height between heights reported to the total ascent and adds a decrease to the total descent.

There are several ways of calculating height gain and each have pros and cons. The "spreadsheet" way that I used years ago was to use a spreadsheet accumulating height gain/loss between waypoints. This has the advantage of being self consistent, but the disadvantage of not recording minor ascents/descents between waypoints.

Then there is the way it is done by the GPS units. However two GPS units going over the same route do not always seem to produce the same figures and are often different by 10% as well as being often 10 to 15% higher than the "spreadsheet" method.

The most consistent method I have seen is that employed by Trailmaster which uses an accurate DEM (digital elevation model) of the land, however this DEM is not at present public and the public versions that are available would not necessarily improve the situation enough to be worthwhile using.

The reason for choosing the current method is that it is transparent. No smoothing or calculation other than addition or subtraction is done, however I would consider a different approach if necessary.

(Note: for speed estimation as used for estimating the users speed and colouring the track an elaborate smoothing algorithm IS used which seems to work well.)
Additional points:So I would be happy to make changes however based a. on evidence and b. on a clear argument as to why another algorithm would be better.

Call for voluntary help. I could use help from someone with statistical ability and some appreciation of what can and cannot be done using numerical methods to analyse sample tracks and devise a proposed, better method of calculating height calculation.

In the meanwhile, here are some known things you can do to improve accuracy.
a. turn on gps in advance of walking, for example in your house but in view of the sky, to allow the unit to figure out its position ("finding the ephemeris"). Turn it off after not more than 12 minutes. When you then turn it on at or immediately before the walk starts let it have a good view of the sky (reduces high initial errors in readings)
b. when carrying the gps position it so it always has a good view of the sky. This reduces trackpoint height measurement errors, which can accumulate and give spuriously high figures.
c. in general leave the gps on and in good view of the sky for the whole walk. (reduces start errors)

Remember also that no matter what solution is arrived at, there is no perfect answer as the problem is similar to that notorious one of measuring the length of a coastline, which depends on size of the ruler. However that said, there could be a better algorithm with an explicable rationale.
Context of comment:   (Show all posts)
Context of comment:   (Show all posts)


RECENT CONTRIBUTIONS 1 2 3 .. 18 Next page >>
User profile
eamonoc
eamonoc 7 hours ago.
A lot of walking done and so much more to do, thank you Mountainviews for the inspiration

  
Summit Summary
Caherbarnagh East Top: A Hidden Gem Discovered
Collaborative entry Last edit by: simon3 a day ago.
Park off road next to gate at the saddle between Claragh Mountain and Curracahill W23626 87990. There's room for 3-4 cars to park safely. Climb gate and follow rough stone track keeping forest to ...

  
Summit Comment
Corraun Hill: Views! what views?
Harry Goodman 2 days ago.
Climbed this hill on Wed. 12 Oct 2011. Our intention was to start from Belfarsad Bridge but the blanket of thick mist covering the Plateau made me opt for the simpler climb from Burnanioo Bridge s...

Track
Simple ascent of Minaun.
simon3 3 days ago.
An easy way up starting from the carpark. walk, Len: 3.6km, Climb: 121m, Area: Minaun, Achill/Corraun (Ireland) Minaun

  
Summit Summary
Corraun Hill: Western summit on plateau above big corrie lakes.
Collaborative entry Last edit by: simon3 2 days ago.
(1) Bunannio Bridge Route: Start around L737 943. Take the well made track E up to a T junction L751 948, turn left and follow track to its end L749 950. Go NW up the hillside for some 1.2k over s...

  
Track
molls gap loop walk
strangeweaver 2 days ago.
From the car park at molls gap follow the narrow country lane down to the pass between to stumpa duloigh and Knocklome... walk, Len: 17.6km, Climb: 985m, Area: Dunkerron Mountains (Ireland) Knocklome

Track
Puglia: Circuit south of Otranto
Onzy 4 days ago.
walk, Len: 11.1km, Climb: 215m, Area: Italy, Apulia ()

  
Summit Comment
Kilfarrasy Hill: What Lies Beneath is better than What Lies Up Top
Pepe 3 days ago.
You can drive over this. A very minor public road connects Kilfarassy with the R675 northeast of Annestown. This road crests the exact top of Kilfarassy Hill. A much better way of doing it is to p...

  
Track
Puglia: Trajan Way to Ostuni
Onzy 4 days ago.
walk, Len: 10.9km, Climb: 264m, Area: Italy, Apulia ()

Forum: General
Reviewers wanted.
simon3 4 days ago.
Interested in reviewing either of two new books?Mourne and Cooley Mountains is by Adrian HendroffThe Comeragh, Galtee, Knockmealdown and Slieve Bloom is from John G. O’Dwyer. Let us know at admin@...

  
Summit Comment
Westtown Hill: The Folks Who Live on the Hill
Pepe 3 days ago.
Curiosity made me investigate Westown Hill, having blissfully passed within a hundred metres of its ‘summit’ many a time on walks, drives and cycles. The top lies up a tarmac road leading west off...

  
Forum: General
Morocco
spiider28 2 weeks ago.
Thanks for the detailed advice @kernowclimber, really appreciate it


RECENT CONTRIBUTIONS 1 2 3 .. 18 Next page >>