MountainViews
Welcome to MountainViews
If you want to use the website often please enrol (quick and free) at top right.

General Whatever you want to say that doesn't fit under the comments about places or another forum.
Sort by >

More controls

<< Prev page 1 .. 23 24 25 26 27 28 .. 387 Next page >>
Post details Post   (Contract pics)
Subscribers to the.. by Peter Walker   (Show all posts)
There is a proposa.. by mcrtchly   (Show all posts)
SCAVENGER WALK 12 .. by Peter Walker   (Show all posts)
CaptainVertigo
2016-04-18 19:50:47
The Wall Decision: Let There be No Panic
The legal duty of occupiers of land to “recreational users” is set out in Section 4 of the Occupiers' Liability Act of 1995. It is the same duty that is owed to trespassers:
(a) not to injure the person or damage the property of the person intentionally, and
(b) not to act with reckless disregard for the person or the property of the person.
I would encourage any of you who take an interest in these matters to read Section 4 of the Act below. It will take no more than a few minutes.
The Supreme Court, whose decisions bind the lower courts, interpreted Section 4 in the case of Geraldine Weir-Rodgers v SF Trust Ltd in 2005. I have summarised that case below. You may wish to read the full judgment at: http://www.environ.ie/sites/default/files/migrated-files/en/Publications/Community/RuralDevelopment/FileDownLoad,38227,en.pdf
And there is a detailed commentary by Professor William Binchy at: http://www.claruspress.ie/TORT1.pdf
I am not aware if the Circuit Court Judge in the Wall case handed down a written judgment. If she did, I have not seen it. Although the Irish Times and other papers have summarised the judgment, one would prefer to have the benefit of the detailed legal reasoning.
Already the IFA is expressing concerns. According to Journal.ie
“In a statement this morning, IFA Hill Commitee Chairman Pat Dunne has said that although the judgement refers to property owned by the National Parks and Wildlife Service, “farmers will be very wary of the consequences where hill walkers ramble off designated routes”.
He said that the issue was being discussed by the Comhairle na Tuaithe, an organisation within the Department of the Environment made up of farming organisations and other parties with an interest in the countryside.
The aims of these discussions are to give reassurance to farmers that they will not be held culpable if a similar incident were to happen on their land.”

Distinguishing the Wall Judgment
It is far too early to conclude that the Wall judgment represents a new legal threat to the occupiers of land. Crucially, the NPWS constructed a boardwalk with old sleepers which were found by the court to have been in a dangerous state. Walkers were positively encouraged to walk on that boardwalk. Section 4 (4) of the Act says:
“ Notwithstanding subsection (1), where a structure on premises is or has been provided for use primarily by recreational users, the occupier shall owe a duty towards such users in respect of such a structure to take reasonable care to maintain the structure in a safe condition”
And that appears to be what happened in the Wall case. A structure was put in place for use by recreational users and therefore it ought to have been maintained. A completely different regime applies where structures are NOT primarily for the use of recreational users. As the Act says:

“Provided that, where a stile, gate, footbridge or other similar structure on premises is or has been provided not for use primarily by recreational users, the occupier's duty towards a recreational user thereof in respect of such structure shall not be extended by virtue of this subsection”

My current preliminary view is that the Wall decision is not in any sense a dilution of the hillwakers’ principle that you take the mountain as you find it, and accept all the risks involved in a potentially hazardous activity. The Wall decision is about a body creating a structure, directing people to use the structure, and then failing to maintain it. No more than that.

The concerns of the farming community are real, and need to be assuaged. There is NOTHING in the Wall judgment that exposes farm families to extra risk. Farm families are not building special structures for hillwalkers unless they are participating in special schemes where they are fully indemnified. Where hillwalkers cross farm land with or without permission they proceed at their peril. Hillwalkers are generally happy with that arrangement. As a group we take responsibility for our actions. We cannot walk on the land of another citizen and expect compensation if we injure ourselves. That is our "way". Counsel for the NPWS confirmed that this was the first claim against the service. That in itself speaks volumes. The mere fact that the claim has succeeded need not cause dismay. The decision was based on the particular facts of the case. Close scrutiny of those facts, and the reasoning behind the decision, reveals no escalation of liability for landowners/occupiers. Therefore we ought to be indifferent to the outcome of the Appeal. The award may be upheld. So be it. To date there is nothing to suggest that any new principle has been established. Section 4 of the Occupiers' Liability Act continues to protect farmers as it always did. The Supreme Court judgment in Weir-Rodgers v SF Trust Ltd remains fully intact and will bind all lower courts. Nothing has changed.
The Irish Times Re.. by CaptainVertigo   (Show all posts)
Geraldine Weir-Rod.. by CaptainVertigo   (Show all posts)
4.—(1) In respect .. by CaptainVertigo   (Show all posts)
A woman has been a.. by wicklore   (Show all posts)
Donegal Mountain R.. by mcrtchly   (Show all posts)
Ireland’s Minerals.. by simon3   (Show all posts)


RECENT CONTRIBUTIONS 1 2 3 .. 18 Next page >>
Summit Comment
Knockbwee: Summit Revealed
CaminoPat 9 hours ago.
From the south, parking available for only one car at W124 775. Proceed uphill from junction with local road in a NNW direction along a rough stone covered road until you come to a six bar field g...

  
Track
Slieveboy Loop
jgfitz 14 hours ago.
We followed the official National Loop Walk, Loop 106C, which is the purple trail. We took one small shortcut, but add... walk, Len: 14.1km, Climb: 424m, Area: Slieveboy, North Wexford (Ireland) Slie

  
Summit Summary
Crocknafarragh SE Top: Climb it, but include one or more "cousins"
Collaborative entry Last edit by: simon3 a day ago.
The way to Crocknafarragh SE Top can follow the full route up to Crocknafarragh with an additional 700m walk out to the lesser top or, part of the way up, by contouring up and around the S flanks ...

Track
Croughan ridge by going around Lough Acorrymore
simon3 a day ago.
This is a relatively easy way to reach the Croughan ridgeline and get a taste for the magnificent all-round views. Ir... walk, Len: 7.8km, Climb: 595m, Area: Croaghaun SW Top, Achill/Corraun (Ireland

  
Summit Comment
Baurtregaum Far NE Top: Great views from a so-so mountain
Colin Murphy a day ago.
The view over Tralee Bay at low tide from Baurtregaum Far NE Top had the appearance of the Amazon River delta!

  
User profile
eamonoc
eamonoc 2 days ago.
A lot of walking done and so much more to do, thank you Mountainviews for the inspiration

Track
Scouting the start of the Galty Challenge.
jackill a day ago.
walk, Len: 17.5km, Climb: 623m, Area: Slieveanard NE Top, Galty Mountains (Irel...

  
Summit Comment
Bunnacunneen South Top: Simple bag from nearby tops
Colin Murphy a day ago.
For approach see entry for Bunnacunneen SE Top. From that grassy summit it is just over 1km across a gently rising slope to the NW and the South Top's equally grassy summit, which has marvellous p...

  
Track
molls gap loop walk
strangeweaver 4 days ago.
From the car park at molls gap follow the narrow country lane down to the pass between to stumpa duloigh and Knocklome... walk, Len: 17.6km, Climb: 985m, Area: Dunkerron Mountains (Ireland) Knocklome

Summit Summary
Bunnacunneen SE Top: Handy track
Collaborative entry Last edit by: Colin Murphy a day ago.
Although there was a sign on the track at L973 570 forbidding trespassers, the farmer in the nearby farmhouse had no problem with us using the track, which curved up the hillside almost to the sum...

  
Track
Simple ascent of Minaun.
simon3 5 days ago.
An easy way up starting from the carpark. walk, Len: 3.6km, Climb: 121m, Area: Minaun, Achill/Corraun (Ireland) Minaun

  
Summit Summary
Caherbarnagh East Top: A Hidden Gem Discovered
Collaborative entry Last edit by: simon3 3 days ago.
Park off road next to gate at the saddle between Claragh Mountain and Curracahill W23626 87990. There's room for 3-4 cars to park safely. Climb gate and follow rough stone track keeping forest to ...


RECENT CONTRIBUTIONS 1 2 3 .. 18 Next page >>