MountainViews
Welcome to MountainViews
If you want to use the website often please enrol (quick and free) at top right.

General Whatever you want to say that doesn't fit under the comments about places or another forum.
Sort by >

More controls

<< Prev page 1 .. 26 27 28 29 30 31 .. 390 Next page >>
Post details Post   (Contract pics)
Now that weather i.. by brenno   (Show all posts)
Congratulations to.. by mcrtchly   (Show all posts)
Subscribers to the.. by Peter Walker   (Show all posts)
There is a proposa.. by mcrtchly   (Show all posts)
SCAVENGER WALK 12 .. by Peter Walker   (Show all posts)
CaptainVertigo
2016-04-18 19:50:47
The Wall Decision: Let There be No Panic
The legal duty of occupiers of land to “recreational users” is set out in Section 4 of the Occupiers' Liability Act of 1995. It is the same duty that is owed to trespassers:
(a) not to injure the person or damage the property of the person intentionally, and
(b) not to act with reckless disregard for the person or the property of the person.
I would encourage any of you who take an interest in these matters to read Section 4 of the Act below. It will take no more than a few minutes.
The Supreme Court, whose decisions bind the lower courts, interpreted Section 4 in the case of Geraldine Weir-Rodgers v SF Trust Ltd in 2005. I have summarised that case below. You may wish to read the full judgment at: http://www.environ.ie/sites/default/files/migrated-files/en/Publications/Community/RuralDevelopment/FileDownLoad,38227,en.pdf
And there is a detailed commentary by Professor William Binchy at: http://www.claruspress.ie/TORT1.pdf
I am not aware if the Circuit Court Judge in the Wall case handed down a written judgment. If she did, I have not seen it. Although the Irish Times and other papers have summarised the judgment, one would prefer to have the benefit of the detailed legal reasoning.
Already the IFA is expressing concerns. According to Journal.ie
“In a statement this morning, IFA Hill Commitee Chairman Pat Dunne has said that although the judgement refers to property owned by the National Parks and Wildlife Service, “farmers will be very wary of the consequences where hill walkers ramble off designated routes”.
He said that the issue was being discussed by the Comhairle na Tuaithe, an organisation within the Department of the Environment made up of farming organisations and other parties with an interest in the countryside.
The aims of these discussions are to give reassurance to farmers that they will not be held culpable if a similar incident were to happen on their land.”

Distinguishing the Wall Judgment
It is far too early to conclude that the Wall judgment represents a new legal threat to the occupiers of land. Crucially, the NPWS constructed a boardwalk with old sleepers which were found by the court to have been in a dangerous state. Walkers were positively encouraged to walk on that boardwalk. Section 4 (4) of the Act says:
“ Notwithstanding subsection (1), where a structure on premises is or has been provided for use primarily by recreational users, the occupier shall owe a duty towards such users in respect of such a structure to take reasonable care to maintain the structure in a safe condition”
And that appears to be what happened in the Wall case. A structure was put in place for use by recreational users and therefore it ought to have been maintained. A completely different regime applies where structures are NOT primarily for the use of recreational users. As the Act says:

“Provided that, where a stile, gate, footbridge or other similar structure on premises is or has been provided not for use primarily by recreational users, the occupier's duty towards a recreational user thereof in respect of such structure shall not be extended by virtue of this subsection”

My current preliminary view is that the Wall decision is not in any sense a dilution of the hillwakers’ principle that you take the mountain as you find it, and accept all the risks involved in a potentially hazardous activity. The Wall decision is about a body creating a structure, directing people to use the structure, and then failing to maintain it. No more than that.

The concerns of the farming community are real, and need to be assuaged. There is NOTHING in the Wall judgment that exposes farm families to extra risk. Farm families are not building special structures for hillwalkers unless they are participating in special schemes where they are fully indemnified. Where hillwalkers cross farm land with or without permission they proceed at their peril. Hillwalkers are generally happy with that arrangement. As a group we take responsibility for our actions. We cannot walk on the land of another citizen and expect compensation if we injure ourselves. That is our "way". Counsel for the NPWS confirmed that this was the first claim against the service. That in itself speaks volumes. The mere fact that the claim has succeeded need not cause dismay. The decision was based on the particular facts of the case. Close scrutiny of those facts, and the reasoning behind the decision, reveals no escalation of liability for landowners/occupiers. Therefore we ought to be indifferent to the outcome of the Appeal. The award may be upheld. So be it. To date there is nothing to suggest that any new principle has been established. Section 4 of the Occupiers' Liability Act continues to protect farmers as it always did. The Supreme Court judgment in Weir-Rodgers v SF Trust Ltd remains fully intact and will bind all lower courts. Nothing has changed.
The Irish Times Re.. by CaptainVertigo   (Show all posts)
Geraldine Weir-Rod.. by CaptainVertigo   (Show all posts)
4.—(1) In respect .. by CaptainVertigo   (Show all posts)
A woman has been a.. by wicklore   (Show all posts)


RECENT CONTRIBUTIONS 1 2 3 .. 23 Next page >>
Track
Highwayman A route 2018
jackill 2 hours ago.
Highwayman A - 2018. This years route was slightly less than the 2017 route due to weather conditions. walk, Len: 25.1km, Climb: 580m, Area: Knockshanahullion, Knockmealdown Mountain...

  
Track
Just Dooish !
pazapas 11 hours ago.
?The walk is a simple 24.5km loop all inside Glenveagh National Park. The entrance is free of charge.The route is made walk, Len: 24.5km, Climb: 898m, Area: Donegal NW (Ireland) Crockmulroney, Doo

  
Track
Lough Curra Circuit
Jim Holmes a day ago.
A simple enough route, but very rewarding - from the Cush carpark, head upwards to Lough Curra. Then it's up to the mi... walk, Len: 12.9km, Climb: 1011m, Area: Galtymore, Galty Mountains (Ireland) G

Track
Croghan Kinsella
jgfitz 2 days ago.
This is a variation on track #3938, so I will avoid repeating the comments made there, with which I fully agree. This... walk, Len: 11.4km, Climb: 412m, Area: Croghan Kinsella, Dublin/Wicklow (Irelan

  
Summit Comment
Cnoc na Boirne: Murren.....a little gem.
jsramsey1491 2 days ago.
Last Thursday, 18/10/2018, a few friends and I did a recce on Murren Hill and the surrounding area. We have over the past twenty years or so covered most of the county but this was the first time ...

  
Summit Comment
Slieve Binnian: Mind how you go on a route Not Recommended
Pepe 3 days ago.
Climbed this yesterday on the route leading from Brackenagh Bridge. Chose this route because I wanted to do Moolieve and the Wee Binnian on the way up. On a plus note a local farmer kindly let me ...

Track
Buckaun - Binnaw circuit.
simon3 3 days ago.
Hydro scheme at Lough Nadirkmore.The walk starts from a point high in an east facing coum of Maumtrasna. This road goes walk, Len: 5.8km, Climb: 368m, Area: Partry/Joyce Country (Ireland)

  
Summit Comment
An Bhinn Bhuí: A spectacular landscape
Damian120 3 days ago.
It's a seldom-visited area of County Mayo yet it boasts some of the most impressive coastal architecture in the entire country. After spending five years covering and exploring the landscape of th...

  
Forum: General
THE POWER OF WORDS
Pepe 3 days ago.
There I was scratching around on Slieve Binnian. Up top, I bumped into a couple out hillwalking for the day. Pleasantries were exchanged – which way did you come up, fabulous views, the weather – ...

Track
Knocknalougha South Top
Onzy 3 days ago.
Route to Knocknalougha South Top from Crow Hill carpark ... as outlined by melohara on the Hill Page... walk, Len: 11.7km, Climb: 430m, Area: Knocknalougha South Top, Knockmealdown Mo...

  
Summit Comment
Big Collin: Permission required?
StephenMullin a week ago.
Hi thereCan anybody tell me if permission is required to walk up Big Collin? If so, how does one go about obtaining this?Many thanks!

  
Track
12 (Listed) Bens - Revisited
GSheehy 6 days ago.
I was drawn back by the lure of completing the 2002 - 12 Bens Challenge route. I got the details from John J. Cotter w... walk, Len: 29.1km, Climb: 2598m, Area: Benglenisky, Twelve Bens (Ireland) Ben


RECENT CONTRIBUTIONS 1 2 3 .. 23 Next page >>