Welcome to MountainViews
If you want to use the website often please enrol (quick and free) at top right.

Site Feedback Site announcements, requests for features, bug reports about the software of the service.
Sort by >

More controls

<< Prev page 1 .. 17 18 19 20 21 22 .. 38 Next page >>
Post details Post   (Expand pics)
Context of comment:   (Show all posts)
Context of comment:   (Show all posts)
Context of comment:   (Show all posts)
Context of comment:   (Show all posts)
Context of comment:   (Show all posts)
Context of comment:   (Show all posts)
simon3
2012-04-19 13:44:54
Re Automatic Calculation of Ascent
Context of comment:At least two people have queried the ascent / descent figures created by the track system. I have also noted a number of anomalies in results with test gps tracks from various sources including ones I made myself.
Message:Anomalies include a) usually an apparently high estimate for height gain b) a different figure for ascent and descent. Captain V's apparently lower estimate is a further exception.

The current algorithm used to determine the height gain or loss is extremely simple: it looks at the height recorded for each trackpoint (of which there can be typically between 500 and 5000 for a track). It then adds a positive increase in height between heights reported to the total ascent and adds a decrease to the total descent.

There are several ways of calculating height gain and each have pros and cons. The "spreadsheet" way that I used years ago was to use a spreadsheet accumulating height gain/loss between waypoints. This has the advantage of being self consistent, but the disadvantage of not recording minor ascents/descents between waypoints.

Then there is the way it is done by the GPS units. However two GPS units going over the same route do not always seem to produce the same figures and are often different by 10% as well as being often 10 to 15% higher than the "spreadsheet" method.

The most consistent method I have seen is that employed by Trailmaster which uses an accurate DEM (digital elevation model) of the land, however this DEM is not at present public and the public versions that are available would not necessarily improve the situation enough to be worthwhile using.

The reason for choosing the current method is that it is transparent. No smoothing or calculation other than addition or subtraction is done, however I would consider a different approach if necessary.

(Note: for speed estimation as used for estimating the users speed and colouring the track an elaborate smoothing algorithm IS used which seems to work well.)
Additional points:So I would be happy to make changes however based a. on evidence and b. on a clear argument as to why another algorithm would be better.

Call for voluntary help. I could use help from someone with statistical ability and some appreciation of what can and cannot be done using numerical methods to analyse sample tracks and devise a proposed, better method of calculating height calculation.

In the meanwhile, here are some known things you can do to improve accuracy.
a. turn on gps in advance of walking, for example in your house but in view of the sky, to allow the unit to figure out its position ("finding the ephemeris"). Turn it off after not more than 12 minutes. When you then turn it on at or immediately before the walk starts let it have a good view of the sky (reduces high initial errors in readings)
b. when carrying the gps position it so it always has a good view of the sky. This reduces trackpoint height measurement errors, which can accumulate and give spuriously high figures.
c. in general leave the gps on and in good view of the sky for the whole walk. (reduces start errors)

Remember also that no matter what solution is arrived at, there is no perfect answer as the problem is similar to that notorious one of measuring the length of a coastline, which depends on size of the ruler. However that said, there could be a better algorithm with an explicable rationale.
Context of comment:   (Show all posts)
Context of comment:   (Show all posts)
Context of comment:   (Show all posts)


RECENT CONTRIBUTIONS 1 2 3 .. 19 Next page >>
Track
La Gomera - GR132
GSheehy 15 hours ago.
In 1492, Columbus set out from San Sebasti

  
Summit Summary
Doughruagh South Top: Twin of Doughruagh main top
Collaborative entry Last edit by: liz50 3 days ago.
Located behind Kylemore Abbey, it has been reported that access from the grounds is no longer allowed. It is possible to park in a small lay-by at L77637 58711 and walk approx 30m along the road t...

  
Summit Summary
Doughruagh: Rocky summit with access issues from Kylemore Abbey
Collaborative entry Last edit by: liz50 3 days ago.
Located behind Kylemore Abbey, it has been reported that access from the grounds is no longer allowed. It is possible to park in a small lay-by at L77637 58711 and walk approx 30m along the road t...

Summit Summary
Raghtin More: The smallest Inishowen Arderin
Collaborative entry Last edit by: liz50 4 days ago.
The easiest approach is to park at Urrismenagh viewpoint carpark C317 443 and follow the track to its highest point. From here you can avoid Crockmain and carry on towards Raghtin More to the Nort...

  
Summit Summary
Crockmain: An uninspiring summit with great views
Collaborative entry Last edit by: liz50 4 days ago.
The easiest approach is to park at Urrismenagh viewpoint carpark C317 443 and follow the track to its highest point before heading north over heather to the summit. Alternatively from Mamore Gap c...

  
Summit Summary
Currywongaun: Rough and Rocky
Collaborative entry Last edit by: liz50 3 days ago.
Park off road in a small lay-by at L72134 59157 and ascend the spur in a roughly Easterly direction to the summit. Usually climbed en-route to its larger neighbor Doughraugh.

Summit Summary
Knocknanacree: Views to Slieve Mish and the Dingle Peninsula
Collaborative entry Last edit by: liz50 4 days ago.
Summit can be approached from the West by parking near Minard Castle V556 992 and following a rough track uphill past a quarry and onto the summit ridge.A shorter steeper approach is possible from...

  
Track
Forbidden Keadeen
CaptainVertigo 4 days ago.
Please DO NOT attempt to gain access to Keadeen from the road by following my route. The owner, who is a very decent ... walk, Len: 7.2km, Climb: 487m, Area: Keadeen Mountain, Dublin/Wicklow (Ireland

  
Summit Summary
Teeromoyle Mountain: A summit in the middle of a classic Horseshoe walk
Collaborative entry Last edit by: liz50 4 days ago.
This summit is usually accessed whilst walking the Glenbeigh Horseshoe. A shortened version taking in the 4 central 600m summits in the centre of the horseshoe Teeromoyle, Coomacarrea, Mullaghnara...

Summit Comment
Bruse Hill: Bruse
Nekarsulm 5 days ago.
Track up from the quarry is overgrown. I partially walked up a small stream, as it at least cuts its way through the whins. Climbing straight upwards, you will see places where some earlier climbe...

  
Summit Comment
Coppanagh: Wear Your Wellies
Pepe 6 days ago.
As of early 2017 the top section of forestry has been felled, making the trig easily visible once you're up. A word of caution: this felling has resulted in a treacherous summit surface; a gazilli...

  
Track
Meentog South East Top
Onzy 5 days ago.
Route to Meentog SET from west. Parking is in a farmyard (with permission) and a helpful track leads up to around 540m walk, Len: 4.1km, Climb: 336m, Area: Glenbeigh Horseshoe (Ireland)


RECENT CONTRIBUTIONS 1 2 3 .. 19 Next page >>