Welcome to MountainViews
If you want to use the website often please enrol (quick and free) at top right.

General Whatever you want to say that doesn't fit under the comments about places or another forum.
Sort by >

More controls

<< Prev page 1 .. 19 20 21 22 23 24 .. 376 Next page >>
Post details Post   (Expand pics)
I must admit it's .. by wicklore   (Show all posts)
The Devil's Ladder.. by CaptainVertigo   (Show all posts)
It would be almost.. by mcrtchly   (Show all posts)
You may well adjud.. by tamjk   (Show all posts)
Hi TamThank you fo.. by Peter Walker   (Show all posts)
Most of the techni.. by aidand   (Show all posts)
Morning, Mr Walker.. by tamjk   (Show all posts)
Hi TamI don't know.. by Peter Walker   (Show all posts)
tamjk
2015-09-02 17:17:42
OSI Perspectives . . . .
Wicklore,

I realise that the phrasing I used was ambiguous but I did not mean to suggest that MountainViews was a representative organization for climbers. By "other representative organization" I had in mind Mountaineering Ireland and its larger local climbing clubs.
Last year when I made a congratulatory email to OSI on publication of their 1:25,000 maps, I expressed a wish that they cover more of the other mountain ranges of Kerry & Cork like Brandon Mts, Slieve Mish range, Caha/Sugarloaf, etc. I also expressed a hope that safe summit routes would be added to these maps to prevent the annual loss of young adults on these mountains since it seemed to me - moreover on reading inquest reports on climbing falls - that many climbers simply set out on their last climb without a clear idea of their chosen route and its risks.
My respondent replied that he largely agreed with these sentiments but had not been able to identify any single authority responsible for selecting such routes. My own experience when discussing the matter with personnel in MI, KMR, etc has been similar. MI : "support services to members only"; KMR : "rescue & recovery only."
On the matter of 1:25,000 map production itself - regardless of mountain route inclusion - he offered production cost and uncertainty of market as reasons for not rolling out more than 3 of these maps "pending the introduction of new technology".

It's hard not to get the feeling that a sort of machismo montañero exists among the management of climbing organizations. A simple analysis of the routes most frequently associated with rescue operations should tell which routes are definitely NOT for day-trippers. While most of us have different climbing difficulty issues - and for sure different fear issues - I think we can all see that certain routes are clearly dangerous for people just looking for a day out.

As regards the 1:25,000 maps themselves, I no longer believe that OSI has a serious data, processing or production cost problem with making these.
What they do have - or so imagine - is a "pension fund deficit" problem.
Look at the accounts for OSI (you'll get them in the Annual Report on their website) and you'll see a rare bird.
You'll see Pension Fund entries figure prominently not just as a footnote to the Balance Sheet but bang in the middle of their Income Statement, BS and other financial statements.
I'm no accountant but I would have thought that whatever the pension liabilities of OSI may be, it ought hardly be allowed to restrict the investment needed to maintain their raison-d'etre activities. If nothing else, selling maps to walkers, bikers, climbers and tourists might be the only way by which they can ever clear their pension fund shortfall.
But OSI seems heading for the ultimate stop on the Bureaucratic Absurdity Line : its primary purpose being to provide a comfortable income to its present and past functionaries.
The much-vaunted digital map offering cost €48 for an A4 size and around €70 for an A3 size is hardly a plausible alternative for ordinary climbers, walkers and bikers. After all that you have the cost of printing them.
I'm told that a Cambridge company has been given rights to use OSI map data in their app (Viewranger) for people doing routes. But the maximum resolution is poor and the actual map images look oldish. The peak-names cover much of the peak contours and increase in size as the resolution increases, which makes the estimation of cross-sections and gradients awkward. No way is it a viable alternative to a hard-copy high-res map.
So there we are climbing in Ireland - on our own and without a proper map to guide us !

@ Mcrtchly,

If the 'Sirrah' term offended you, I apologize.
I used it in its dramatic sense. I make no claim on superiority of any kind on you.
As to the 1:25,000 map, all i can say is that i looked at the Killarney National Park Adventure map yesterday and it seemed to run no further west than the mountain range just east of the Mullaghanattin Horseshoe.
But you are the expert in this and I accept your statement that the Mullaghanattin Horseshoe is covered here.
But I do not accept that OSI correctly judges the market for these maps as inadequate to produce more than 3 of them.
I don't say that ALL the country need be covered. Just those areas with sufficient detail and demand. I think that Slieve Mish and Caha fall into this category, as do other areas in this country.
In reply to Tamjk'.. by mcrtchly   (Show all posts)


RECENT CONTRIBUTIONS 1 2 3 .. 25 Next page >>
Forum: General
a man's word
BleckCra 4 hours ago.
Aidan thanks. Good to hear from you. There's a kind of accuracy in your translation even although there isn't. Still, it's close and ants aren't.There are essentially 3 titles for hills in Irish.S...

  
Track
Pic d'Anie
David-Guenot 10 hours ago.
walk, Len: 16.0km, Climb: 1027m, Area: France, Nouvelle-Aquitaine ()

  
Track
Pic et Lacs d'Ayous
David-Guenot 10 hours ago.
walk, Len: 20.2km, Climb: 1113m, Area: France, Nouvelle-Aquitaine ()

Track
Pic des Trois Seigneurs
David-Guenot 10 hours ago.
walk, Len: 9.7km, Climb: 904m, Area: France, Occitanie ()

  
Track
Forts, a monster, invasions, rocky walls and limestone.
simon3 18 hours ago.
D

  
Forum: General
Welcome back Crá
aidand 12 hours ago.
This Forum has been a dull place for a long time. Great to have Crá's passionate and well written views.www.logainm.ie is a fine website dedicated to Irish placenames. Maybe it doesn't cover the n...

Summit Comment
Rostoohy Hill: Coastal Hill
sandman 4 days ago.
The summit area with its hill fort and views across the bay.

  
Summit Comment
Rosgalliv Hill: Coastal Hill
sandman 4 days ago.
For the Mountain View members who will be joining Liz50 for her walk on 7/10/17 why not get there a few minutes earlier in order to visit this small hill with its Megalithic Tomb . Parking is avai...

  
Summit Comment
Rostoohy Hill: Coastal Hill
sandman 4 days ago.
Parking where appropriate make your way the short distance along the foreshore to L9531390160 where ascent to the hill exists as shown in the photo. You will encounter a small stone drinking well ...

Summit Comment
Claggan Hill: Coastal Hill
sandman 4 days ago.
Although the trig is clearly visible from where i parked for Roscahill a double fence lies in wait from there. Easy access is via the field gate located at L9409289344 with ample parking 50 meters...

  
Summit Comment
Roscahill Hill: Coastal Hill
sandman 4 days ago.
The summit of this hill is located on farmland,the farm house and yard located on the opposite side from where i started .Parking at L9404188766 follow the foreshore to point L9361288446 to where ...

  
Summit Comment
Gubacarrigan: Coastal Hill
sandman 4 days ago.
Your options for parking are numerous but a lay-by is located at L7648192513. It only takes a few minutes to reach the cliff edge and on to the summit but as evident from the tracts along the edge...


RECENT CONTRIBUTIONS 1 2 3 .. 25 Next page >>