Welcome to MountainViews
If you want to use the website often please enrol (quick and free) at top right.

General Whatever you want to say that doesn't fit under the comments about places or another forum.
Sort by >

More controls

<< Prev page 1 .. 73 74 75 76 77 78 .. 378 Next page >>
Post details Post   (Contract pics)
wicklore
2013-10-08 19:56:46
Subjective list of hills
Currently in order for summits to be included on a MountainViews list it has to meet certain objective, measurable criteria. Each list on MV has its own criteria including height & prominence etc. This objective approach makes organising lists a mathematical and logical task and a summit either meets the criteria or does not.

This objective approach can be criticised as it is cold and clinical in how it decides what gets included and what doesn’t. It does not allow a subjective approach to include summits. Many summits that are superior in their appearance, culture or challenge do not make it into MV’s lists if they don’t meet the logical criteria. Equally, some truly appalling summits DO make it into the MV lists by virtue of the fact that they meet the logical criteria.

MV has always stuck to the logical approach. This has resulted in a current list of 1025 summits. All of them either meet plain mathematical criteria or are the high point of a county. MV has always attracted criticism for the summits we leave out. For years we have heard the various solid arguments for why other summits of beauty, historical or physical importance, local interest or challenge should be included. Some suggest that there should be NO criteria at all – that if someone feels it should be on MV, well then it should be.

It takes an enormous amount of work to prepare a hill for inclusion on MV. We can’t just put up a mountain or hill with no accompanying data. We know from member activity on the site, as well as from the comprehensive feedback we received during a three month survey in 2010, that members want and need data. Lots of data. Map coordinates, access start and finish points, information about parking, gps tracks, photos and descriptions, information on mountain range, county, height, prominence, summit name in English AND Irish...the list goes on. Therefore before we list a summit we must gather all of this information. Do we have gaps in some information, or get some things wrong? – you bet we do! AS a group of volunteers relying solely on the goodwill and time of our background team, as well as the incredible contribution of all our members, it’s natural that things get left out or included in error. MountainViews is open to correction and we make any changes that are deemed (by the MV committee) to have enough evidence to support such a change. The flip side is that we don’t make every change suggested by members – we need those members to provide sufficient evidence or justification for change that makes it worthwhile to prioritise it.

Members have long called for a subjective list of hills – summits that deserve to be included for their intrinsic value and not based on cold logic such as prominence etc. The call for having a subjective list of summits has been consistent over the years. A perusal of the General and Suggestion Forums throws up some typical and valid suggestions from ’09 & ‘10:

Marymac on the Hill of Tara: http://mountainviews.ie/motleyviews/general/comment/1529/ ,

Padodes re Bray Head: http://mountainviews.ie/motleyviews/general/comment/1418/

Reidyden re Stacks Mountains: http://mountainviews.ie/motleyviews/general/comment/1288/

Bryanmccabe re Knockeyon: http://mountainviews.ie/motleyviews/suggestions/comment/1325/

The MV committee began looking at the issue of a subjective hills list in earnest earlier this year. We are nearing completion of a separate two year project that we hope will add over 300 smaller summits to MV in the New Year. As this nears completion we had begun to look ahead and to see what was next on our extensive to-do list. To this end we have focussed on a ‘Hills of Cultural. Historical, Physical and Local interest.’ This is the working title for what will be a purely subjective list. This is where members can nominate a summit they feel should be included, and which doesn’t currently exist on MV or meet traditional requirements. In line with the data available for all MV listed summits, we will need to gather relevant information for new summits such as coordinates, access points, mountain range or area, county etc.

For critics who feel such information is irrelevant we can only say that this is what the vast majority of members want and we don’t intend to just list summit names without the other necessary information to go with them. We have an initial working list and are doing the extensive background work to gather the data needed. We hope this will finally meet the consistent call for such a list and we look forward to rolling it out soon. We also hope that members will not only propose hills for inclusion in such a list, but will also provide decent justification and relevant data too. We will provide more information on this exciting new project later in October. It can take time to make changes, but we do listen to our members!
Tackling each of m.. by Peter Walker   (Show all posts)
Nice photo, Bleckc.. by mcrtchly   (Show all posts)
In recent times, I.. by BleckCra   (Show all posts)
In Search of Peaks.. by simon3   (Show all posts)
Peter Walker - reg.. by BleckCra   (Show all posts)
As mentioned in th.. by simon3   (Show all posts)
Hi andodenis (orig.. by Peter Walker   (Show all posts)
Below are the link.. by kernowclimber   (Show all posts)
Carrickgolligan (O.. by andodenis   (Show all posts)


RECENT CONTRIBUTIONS 1 2 3 .. 23 Next page >>
Forum: General
MountainViews' Pub Quiz
Colin Murphy 2 hours ago.
A great evening was had by all (and a great number of pints were also had by all) on Wednesday 18th at the MV Pub Quiz in the Lansdowne Hotel. Thanks to Jim Holmes for his entertaining turn as qui...

  
Summit Comment
Tinoran Hill: Further Information
Bunsen7 8 hours ago.
On 22/10/17 the gate to the forestry lane was closed over (though unlocked), so I peered into the laneway running parallel to the forestry lane and spotted a farmer to enquire about access.There i...

  
User profile
Geo
Geo a day ago.
October 2017, I am a walker with the Navan Trekkers club,we walk mostly in the Mournes, Cooley and Wicklow mountains on club walks as they are closest but I walk anywhere else I can! Living in suc...

Summit Comment
Lislorkan Top: Coastal Hill
sandman 3 days ago.
Accessible via the Cliffs of Moher Visitor Center and car park or via other locations on this coastal walk of your choosing. Best to enjoy the full length of this fantastic cliff walk.

  
Summit Comment
Knockardakin: Coastal Hill
sandman 3 days ago.
Located adjacent to the world renowned Cliffs of Moher,and although this is the hill which the visitor center is built into, the summit is not located in a public area. Access is via a farm gate o...

  
Summit Comment
Stockeen Cliff Top: Coastal Hill
sandman 3 days ago.
Located adjacent to the cliff walk accessible via the Cliffs of Moher Center. Best to enjoy the full walk rather than just summit bagging but for your added enjoyment the earlier in the morning yo...

Summit Comment
Corduff: My wee dander to the summit
Ulsterpooka 5 days ago.
I followed Muschi's and Paddyhilksbagger route. When going to the trig I moved on a few cows before I walked to the trig. After taking a few pics I seen the large brown bull in the field was block...

  
Track
Inishowen Slieve Snaght from the north.
simon3 a week ago.
This linear walk route starts from the north and includes the two Arderins and one Vandeleur-Lynam in the area. It sta... walk, Len: 9.3km, Climb: 515m, Area: Slieve Snaght, Inishowen (Ireland) Sliev

  
Track
Cruach Eoghanach
Peter Walker a week ago.
Cruach Eoghanach is a handy outing on the days when you get out of the car, feel the force of the wind and rain, look... walk, Len: 10.4km, Climb: 329m, Area: Cruach Eoghanach, S Donegal/W Tyrone (Ir

Summit Summary
Slieve Main: Inishowen's second mountain.
Collaborative entry Last edit by: simon3 a week ago.
Parking in a small quarry 3km to the east at point C444 372, cross the smaller top of Damph and then head north, curving around the valley until you cross a fence at C425 380 then begin to ascend ...

  
Track
Pics de Batoua
David-Guenot a week ago.
walk, Len: 18.3km, Climb: 1672m, Area: France, Occitanie ()

  
Summit Comment
Castlemahon Mountain: My outing to Castlemahon summit.
Ulsterpooka a week ago.
I followed Peter Walkers route and asked permission to walk to the summit mast. The person was very friendly and accommodating. I parked at the last house in what is a four house dwelling lane. Th...


RECENT CONTRIBUTIONS 1 2 3 .. 23 Next page >>